Register
 Login
 Main Page
 MedTech News
Tech & Innovation
Living With a Device
 Education Center
Diagnostic Tests
Conditions
Procedures
Women's Health
Companies
Online Resources
Video Library
Dr. Sherif Emil, Pediatric Surgeon, Scars1 Hero  MedTech  Hero™
Drs. Sherif Emil and Nabil Fanous:
Pioneering Surgical Techniques to Minimize Scars.
About Heroes
 Join the Discussion in  Our Forums
 Community
MedTech1 Forums
 Advocacy Center
Become an Advocate
Contact Congress
Find a Patient Group
  Video Library
 
 Bookmark Us
 
advertisement
Search the Body1 Network
September 09, 2010  
MEDTECH NEWS: Latest Headlines

  • Print this Article
  • Email this Article
  • Links/Reprints
  • Discuss this Article
  • Breast Ultrasound Urged in Some Cases


    September 20, 2002

    WASHINGTON (AP) - Ultrasound exams can significantly increase the chance of detecting breast cancer early in some women, a radiologist said Thursday as he discussed his new study on the topic.

    Small cancers can be hard to detect in women with dense breast tissue through mammograms or physical exams, Dr. Thomas M. Kolb told an American Medical Association science writers conference.

    Women should be told how dense their breasts are, which only a mammogram can determine, Kolb said. Women with the most dense tissue may want to seek an ultrasound exam in addition to a mammogram, he said.

    Kolb, a radiologist in private practice in New York, estimated that as many as 49 percent of women have dense breast tissue.

    He said the study of 27,825 women being published in the journal Radiology found significant improvement in cancer detection with the ultrasound exams.

    For example, he said, in women with fatty breasts - the least dense - a mammogram can catch 98 percent of cancers before they are large enough to be felt. Fatty tissue appears dark on the mammogram image while the tumor is white.

    But as tissue density increases it also appears white, making it harder to differentiate a tumor, Kolb explained.

    In women with the most dense breasts, a mammogram only detected 48 percent of the smallest tumors, he said. Combining mammograms and ultrasound exams raised the detection rate to 94 percent, he said.

    Dr. Jennifer Harvey of the University of Virginia said she sometimes recommends ultrasound in addition to mammograms for patients who are at high risk and whose breasts are extremely dense.

    For women with very dense breasts the sensitivity of a mammogram is about 50 percent, she said. Because density does not affect ultrasound it can be a nice compliment to mammography, she said.

    But the patient still needs to have both tests done, said Harvey, who was not part of Kolb's research group.

    She said it will be interesting to see if other investigators have findings similar to his.

    Kolb said false positive rate in which ultrasound found something that needed to be checked with a biopsy, but turned out not to be cancer, was 2.5 percent.

    Unfortunately, Kolb said, because ultrasound is not currently accepted practice for detecting breast cancer it is not covered by insurance, meaning an extra expense of up to $100 for the woman who wants the test. Harvey said the test can run up to $140.

    ---=

    On the Net:

    Radiology: http://radiology.rsnajnls.org/


    Last updated: 20-Sep-02

       
    Interact on Medtech1
    DISCUSS THIS ARTICLE
    Ask a question or share your opinions on this topic with others in the Body1 community.
     
    Latest Headlines Archives
    Going for Gold With a Novel Interventional Radiology Treatment for Pancreatic Cancer

    Foam Bones: A New Generation of Biomedical Implants

    Tongue-Controlled Wheelchair Holds Hope for the Quadriplegics and Others

    Can ‘Report Cards’ on Clinics Improve Patient Care?

    Going out Green – Boomers Reinvent the Funeral Industry

    Next 5 Features ...

    More Headlines ...

     
    Home About Us Press Jobs Advertise With Us Contact Us
    advertisement
    ©1999- 2010 Body1, Inc. All rights reserved.
    Disclaimer: The information provided within this website is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for consultation with your physician or healthcare provider. The opinions expressed herein are not necessarily those of the Owners and Sponsors of this site. By using this site you agree to indemnify, and hold the Owners and Sponsors harmless, from any disputes arising from content posted here-in.